[Apparmor-dev] [rfr] apparmor_status: report more detailed
information
Seth Arnold
seth.arnold at suse.de
Wed May 30 13:23:06 MDT 2007
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:01:55PM -0400, Mathias Gug wrote:
> I've attached an updated diff.
Thanks ;)
> + for (keys(%processes)) {
> + $enforced_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'enforce';
> + $complain_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'complain';
> + $unconstrained_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'unconstrained';
> + }
We should define 'unconstrained' and 'unconfined' in a single place,
so that we can change all tools to use the correct word in one go. :(
(Another option is to use an unconfined() routine that checks for both
unconstrained and unconfined..)
Sigh. </rant>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://forge.novell.com/pipermail/apparmor-dev/attachments/20070530/0f06fab4/attachment.pgp
More information about the Apparmor-dev
mailing list