[Apparmor-dev] [rfr] apparmor_status: report more detailed information

Seth Arnold seth.arnold at suse.de
Wed May 30 13:23:06 MDT 2007


On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:01:55PM -0400, Mathias Gug wrote:
> I've attached an updated diff.

Thanks ;)

> +  for (keys(%processes)) {
> +    $enforced_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'enforce';
> +    $complain_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'complain';
> +    $unconstrained_processes{$_} = $processes{$_} if $processes{$_}{'mode'} eq 'unconstrained';
> +  }

We should define 'unconstrained' and 'unconfined' in a single place,
so that we can change all tools to use the correct word in one go. :(

(Another option is to use an unconfined() routine that checks for both
unconstrained and unconfined..)

Sigh. </rant>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://forge.novell.com/pipermail/apparmor-dev/attachments/20070530/0f06fab4/attachment.pgp


More information about the Apparmor-dev mailing list