[Apparmor-general] Moving To A Pure Capability Model?

Christian Boltz apparmor at cboltz.de
Sun Jan 28 07:57:08 MST 2007


Hello,

just a small note:

Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 17:31 schrieb Crispin Cowan:
> Perhaps in this case it would be best to use the hack of caching the 
> original file name instead of working hard to recover the current file 
> name.   

I would prefer this.

Reason: I once had the case that Apache was denied write access to 
access_log.20070128 because logrotate was to slow in restarting 
Apache ;-)

IMHO it would be a good thing to allow access if the original filename 
was allowed. This would cause less harm than allowing access to 
access_log* (which allows access to all the old logs)

> I don't like it, 

Why? ;-)
IMHO, if the process had access to a file, it won't harm much if it 
still has access after renaming the file.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
Why do you focus so much on _new_ technology? -- New is better. Is
nothink old that is better than new. -- Yes there is. -- Da? Namink
one then. -- The Original Pentium versus counting on your fingers.
-- Da. Da. "Don't divide. Intel inside"  [Sid & Pitr in userfriendly]



More information about the Apparmor-general mailing list