[Apparmor-general] apparmor svn history / tomoyo lms approach
John Johansen
jjohansen at suse.de
Thu Oct 23 04:31:37 MDT 2008
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Is there another repo beside svn? apparmor svn repository has no history. Just
> someone drops bunch of new patches :-/
>
there used to be, but there mostly isn't anymore. The history portion
of the svn is admittedly terrible.
The kernel portion is particularly bad as its done against a quilt
series that is tracked across and merged from a couple of svn's. With
branching of different kernel versions not happening correctly.
> I'm using for-kernel/2.6.25 and I wonder if there were any important fixes
> but... finding that without history is a big problem unfortunately.
>
There are in fact some fixes that haven't been applied to the 2.6.25
branch but I haven't had time to update the 2.6.25 branch yet. The
update will happen soon.
> Second question - is apparmor planing to switch to much less invasive approach
> like tomoyo is proposing?
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=122161780530938&w=2
>
> Current vfs-*.patches are so invasive and hard to deal with (+ conflicting
> with tons of other patches used by some distros).
Yes. While there are some issues with the tomoyo patch series we are
going to port to it, as it has a much better chance of going up stream.
cheers
john
More information about the Apparmor-general
mailing list