[Apparmor-general] apparmor svn history / tomoyo lms approach

John Johansen jjohansen at suse.de
Thu Oct 23 04:31:37 MDT 2008


Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Is there another repo beside svn? apparmor svn repository has no history. Just 
> someone drops bunch of new patches :-/
> 
there used to be, but there mostly isn't anymore.  The history portion
of the svn is admittedly terrible.

The kernel portion is particularly bad as its done against a quilt
series that is tracked across and merged from a couple of svn's.  With
branching of different kernel versions not happening correctly.

> I'm using for-kernel/2.6.25 and I wonder if there were any important fixes 
> but... finding that without history is a big problem unfortunately.
> 
There are in fact some fixes that haven't been applied to the 2.6.25
branch but I haven't had time to update the 2.6.25 branch yet.  The
update will happen soon.

> Second question - is apparmor planing to switch to much less invasive approach 
> like tomoyo is proposing? 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=122161780530938&w=2
> 
> Current vfs-*.patches are so invasive and hard to deal with (+ conflicting 
> with tons of other patches used by some distros).
Yes.  While there are some issues with the tomoyo patch series we are
going to port to it, as it has a much better chance of going up stream.


cheers
john


More information about the Apparmor-general mailing list