Reduced header file inclusions
Robby Stephenson
robby at periapsis.org
Tue Apr 10 21:18:20 MDT 2007
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > failed when trying to build in a dapper chroot. Given that it's only
> > > an 8 months old distribution, I'm afraid it might affect some
> > > others...
>
> Every person who wants to compile tellico by it's own (package managers,
> ...) should have no big problems to add a single missing include and it
> will stabilize soon ...
True, but you'd be surprised. :) And I get more than a couple of emails
occasionally from people for whom tellico is the first program they've ever
tried to compile!
I'm compiling with your patch right now.
> > > A slightly modified patch is on an other of my machines, I will post
> > > it soon.
>
> I would like to see what I missed ...
>
> PS: I know it's not one of the most useful patches you ever received, but
> let's start with minor issues ...
> Yesterday I worked on proper sorting of dependent columns.
Might be easier now since I refactored the comparisons into a separate
class. Just subclass ListViewComparison and add the constructor to the
factory method there.
This is the case where you wanted to sort by the first field mentioned in
the dependent field, then the 2nd, etc. right? Rather than sorting by the
combined string value? I'm trying to figure out a case where that might be
different than what a user might expect naturally. So far, I can't think of
an example. :)
Robby
More information about the tellico-users
mailing list